More con thoughts
Apr. 11th, 2012 12:20 pmOne of the things I sometimes do at work is train up "listeners", a safe, non-management neutral ear, who people can talk to if they are stressed about things. These people are not the "people who have to do things" in an official way, but can support conversations with people who do things to fix things. Not counselling, just a talk-it-through person who can make useful referals if the individual wishes.
Good or bad idea for cons? We could describe them at opening, and why they are there, and they can have the DCM hotline number for emergencies...?
Good or bad idea for cons? We could describe them at opening, and why they are there, and they can have the DCM hotline number for emergencies...?
no subject
Date: 2012-04-11 12:31 pm (UTC)I wonder how these people could be recognised by those who need their services.
Sometimes excellent services provided by the convention go unnoticed. For example despite being told there was going to be one it was only two days into the convention before I found out where the "quiet room" was.
Thankfully I had a hotel room which was closer than the quiet room but that isn't always the case.
no subject
Date: 2012-04-11 12:43 pm (UTC)What I am thinking is that we could use people who are friendly, neutral, and willing to discuss any aspect of the convention with members (while they are on duty).
To some extent that turns them into walking, talking, interactive ReadMe's - the interface between concom and members when members perhaps don't know who to speak to directly.
Hopefully this idea wouldn't dilute your original aim but it might be more attractive to future committees
no subject
Date: 2012-04-11 12:50 pm (UTC)xx
you can know I am supposed to be doing work I don't like cos I'm reading and actually POSTING on live journal.
no subject
Date: 2012-04-11 03:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-04-11 04:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-04-11 04:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-04-11 05:04 pm (UTC)Thank you
no subject
Date: 2012-04-11 05:08 pm (UTC)If I were doing it again I would be thinking of better back up plans. Or making sure I got mobile numbers to let you know when I was back.
no subject
Date: 2012-04-11 07:24 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-04-11 10:42 pm (UTC)Whenever I have worked for Ops (I think including 2 EasterCons & 2 WorldCons) I have spent periods roving around looking for waifs & strays, lost property, damaged/missing signage, acting as an interactive ReadMe indeed ... Also behind the Ops desk ensuring all problems are logged, and either flagged immediately to Con Committee or reviewed with the shift manager. (Some things like lost programmes / badges can often be resolved immediately.)
Maybe the Ops people could be made more visible, (hi-viz vests?), mainly they can be spotted wandering around through being wired with a walky-talky & ear-piece. (And dressed a lot more casually than any similarly equipped convention centre staff!)
Ops is about keeping the convention running as smoothly as possible, and protecting ConCom from the relative trivia of non-urgent or easily fixable requests.
I would hope the listening service would be separate.
no subject
Date: 2012-04-15 09:00 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-04-15 01:06 pm (UTC)